Partner with us
Media centre
Sign up to our newsletter
Research
City by city
Data
Blog
Podcasts
Events
About
Current issues
Industrial strategy
Devolution
Housing
Productivity
Net zero
The Great British Brain Drain
By
Paul Swinney
,
Maire Williams
| 21 November 2016
The Great British Brain Drain
By
Paul Swinney
,
Maire Williams
| 21 November 2016
Select Chapter
Executive Summary
Introduction
The nature of migration within England and Wales
Figure Figure 1: Migration by age group, 2009-2015
Figure Figure 2: Qualifications of movers by age, 2010-2011
Figure Figure 3: Destination of movers by qualification for city groups, 2010-2011
Figure Figure 4: Net inflow by qualification for individual cities, 2010-2011
Figure Figure 5: Net inflow by age and qualification for city groups, 2010-2011
Figure Summary
The migration of students and graduates
Figure Figure 6: Share of all students at university in 2014/15 by their home and university town
Figure Figure 7: Net flows of students at university in 2014/15
Figure Figure 8: Where students at university in 2014/15 came from
Figure Graduation signals a stark change in movements, with London the big winner
Figure Figure 9: Flow of graduates six months after graduation, 2013/14 and 2014/15
Figure Figure 10: Share of all working graduates six months after graduation
Figure London’s success is based on its ability to both retain and attract graduates
Figure Figure 11: Graduate retention rate by city, 2013/14 and 2014/15
Figure Figure 12: Distribution of those who worked in a different city after graduation to where they studied, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Figure 13: Net flow of graduates from other cities to London, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Box 1: The march of the returners
Figure London’s attraction is even greater for high achievers
Figure Figure 14: Share of all moving graduates by institution and class of degree, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Box 2: The movements of Oxbridge students and graduates
Figure Most cities experience a graduate gain
Figure Figure 15: The balance between the loss of domiciled students against the gaining of graduates from elsewhere, 2013/14 – 2014/15
Figure Figure 16: The bouncers and the graduate gain, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Box 3: City case studies
Figure Figure 17: The distribution of where students live, where they study and where they move to after graduation, 2013/14 – 2014/15
Figure Box 4: The composition of cities’ new graduate workforces
Figure Summary
What drives the geography of new graduates?
Figure Figure 18: The size of the graduate labour market and the share of graduates that work in the city they grew up in, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Figure 19: The size of the graduate labour market and mean graduate wages, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Figure 20: Share of new graduate positions in publicly-funded jobs and KIBS and the graduate gain, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Figure 21: Share of new graduates working in publicly-funded and KIBS jobs, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Figure 22: The publicly-funded and private sectors in the new graduate jobs market, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Box 5: The role of publicly funded industries in the new graduate labour market
Figure Figure 23: Graduate gain and housing affordability, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Figure 24: Correlations between the share of graduates by achievement and housing affordability, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Amenities matter but not as much as employment factors
Figure Figure 25: Graduates employed in higher level occupations and the ‘graduate gain’, 2013/14-2014/15
Figure Summary
Do graduates return home in later life?
Figure Box 6: Examples of graduate attraction and retention policies
Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
Figure Policy recommendations
Data and Methodology Note
00
26: Net flows to London of degree holders aged 22-25 and 31-45, 2011
Next chapter
