Partner with us
Media centre
Sign up to our newsletter
Research
City by city
Data
Blog
Podcasts
Events
About
Current issues
Cities Outlook
Industrial strategy
Devolution
Housing
Metro mayors
The Great British Brain Drain
By
Paul Swinney
,
Maire Williams
| 21 November 2016
The Great British Brain Drain
By
Paul Swinney
,
Maire Williams
| 21 November 2016
Select Chapter
Executive Summary
Introduction
The nature of migration within England and Wales
Box Figure 1: Migration by age group, 2009-2015
Box Figure 2: Qualifications of movers by age, 2010-2011
Box Figure 3: Destination of movers by qualification for city groups, 2010-2011
Box Figure 4: Net inflow by qualification for individual cities, 2010-2011
Box Figure 5: Net inflow by age and qualification for city groups, 2010-2011
Box Summary
The migration of students and graduates
Box Figure 6: Share of all students at university in 2014/15 by their home and university town
Box Figure 7: Net flows of students at university in 2014/15
Box Figure 8: Where students at university in 2014/15 came from
Box Graduation signals a stark change in movements, with London the big winner
Box Figure 9: Flow of graduates six months after graduation, 2013/14 and 2014/15
Box Figure 10: Share of all working graduates six months after graduation
Box London’s success is based on its ability to both retain and attract graduates
Box Figure 11: Graduate retention rate by city, 2013/14 and 2014/15
Box Figure 12: Distribution of those who worked in a different city after graduation to where they studied, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Figure 13: Net flow of graduates from other cities to London, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Box 1: The march of the returners
Box London’s attraction is even greater for high achievers
Box Figure 14: Share of all moving graduates by institution and class of degree, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Box 2: The movements of Oxbridge students and graduates
Box Most cities experience a graduate gain
Box Figure 15: The balance between the loss of domiciled students against the gaining of graduates from elsewhere, 2013/14 – 2014/15
Box Figure 16: The bouncers and the graduate gain, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Box 3: City case studies
Box Figure 17: The distribution of where students live, where they study and where they move to after graduation, 2013/14 – 2014/15
Box Box 4: The composition of cities’ new graduate workforces
Box Summary
What drives the geography of new graduates?
Box Figure 18: The size of the graduate labour market and the share of graduates that work in the city they grew up in, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Figure 19: The size of the graduate labour market and mean graduate wages, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Figure 20: Share of new graduate positions in publicly-funded jobs and KIBS and the graduate gain, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Figure 21: Share of new graduates working in publicly-funded and KIBS jobs, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Figure 22: The publicly-funded and private sectors in the new graduate jobs market, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Figure 23: Graduate gain and housing affordability, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Figure 24: Correlations between the share of graduates by achievement and housing affordability, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Amenities matter but not as much as employment factors
Box Figure 25: Graduates employed in higher level occupations and the ‘graduate gain’, 2013/14-2014/15
Box Summary
Do graduates return home in later life?
Box Figure 26: Net flows to London of degree holders aged 22-25 and 31-45, 2011
Box Box 6: Examples of graduate attraction and retention policies
Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
Box Policy recommendations
Data and Methodology Note
05
5: The role of publicly funded industries in the new graduate labour market
Next chapter
