Changes in the labour market and the gig economy are playing out differently across the country.
New Centre for Cities’ research has revealed a post-financial crisis self-employment boom in Britain’s urban areas. But too many people working for themselves lack access to training – raising concerns about their long-term security and many cities’ future economic strength.
Self-employment in cities has risen by 44% since 2008, outpacing the national average by almost 25%. But nearly 80% of urban self-employment is mid and lower-skilled in industries such as construction – which is the most popular industry for self-employment in cities – transport, arts and personal services.
While cities need a mix of high and low-skilled employment, high-skilled service export work creates the strongest conditions for economic growth.
People in weaker city economies are more likely to be in lower-skilled self-employment. In Burnley the number of self-employed people has grown by almost 50% since 2008, but just 14% of them are in high-skilled work. Compare this to Cambridge where 42% of self-employed people are in high-skilled work – the highest proportion in the UK. The exception to this trend is Slough, which is the most productive city in the UK but has the lowest share of high-skilled self-employed people.
Everybody should undertake training to ensure their skills remain relevant, but this can be more difficult for self-employed people than employed ones who can access companies’ training funds. This will become a more pressing policy issue if the number of self-employed people continues to rise as it has done in the last decade.
Cities with the highest and lowest proportions of high-skilled self-employed people |
||||
Rank | Highest | Share of self-employment that is high-skilled (%) | Lowest | Share of self-employment that is high-skilled (%) |
1 | Cambridge | 41.8 | Slough | 10.6 |
2 | Oxford | 41.1 | Luton | 10.9 |
3 | Edinburgh | 35.2 | Mansfield | 13 |
4 | Cardiff | 33.8 | Barnsley | 13.2 |
5 | Brighton | 33.0 | Basildon | 13.2 |
(National average: 21.9%) |
Since 2012 there has been a rise in people supplementing regular employment through self-employment, particularly in cities with strong economies. In Cambridge 37% of self-employed people do this – double the amount in Blackburn.
Cities with the highest and lowest proportions of people supplementing employment through self-employment |
||||
Rank | Highest | Share of self-employed people supplementing regular income (%) | Lowest | Share of self-employed people supplementing regular income (%) |
1 | Cambridge | 39.9 | Blackburn | 19.4 |
2 | Oxford | 37.4 | Burnley | 19.7 |
3 | Edinburgh | 32.9 | Luton | 20.5 |
4 | Cardiff | 31.4 | Blackpool | 20.6 |
5 | Exeter | 31.3 | Bradford | 20.7 |
(National average: 25.3%) |
Concerningly, few self-employed people undertake training to future-proof their skills against changes in technology and consumer demand. They are further disadvantaged by a tax system that prevents them from deducting many training costs, particularly training to acquire new skills, from income tax.
The Government should act to ensure that many of the self-employed people in economically weaker cities do not fall further behind as they manage the disruption caused by technological change.
Centre for Cities sets out three proposals for the Government:
Centre for Cities’ Chief Executive Andrew Carter said:
“One in five jobs in cities is likely to be lost to automation and, though we are seeing a self-employment boom, too many people working for themselves in cities are in lower-skilled roles and lack access to the training they need to future proof their careers.
“The Government should act to make it easier for the growing numbers of self-employed people can develop their skills. The rules governing what types of courses self-employed people can deduct from income taxes should be relaxed and establish industry training boards that support people looking to upskill or retrain.
“Without measures such as these there is a very real risk that many self-employed people in Britain’s cities will face an uncertain future.”
Andy Chamberlain, Deputy Director of Policy at IPSE, said:
“This is a timely and excellent report that shows the enormous rise of self-employment in cities across the UK. And not only that, but also the rise of different types of self-employment: from full-time contracting to side-hustles, which allow people to add to their income and pursue a passion in their spare time.
“Crucially, the report also shows just how vital freelancers and the self-employed are for a range of key industries: particularly construction, finance, personal services and transport and communication.
“Despite the vital contribution of the self-employed, however, the report also highlights a key challenge: access to training. Unlike employees, the self-employed generally cannot get training through their client: they have to arrange it and pay for it themselves. Worse: time they spend on training is valuable time they are not being paid for.
“At IPSE, we fully support the Centre for Cities’s calls for self-employed people to be able to deduct training costs from their income taxes. We also believe the New Enterprise Allowance should be extended to give self-employed people mentoring and benefit support for two years.
“The self-employed are clearly a rapidly growing part of our workforce, making a vital contribution to many sectors of the economy – and the government must make sure they can access the training support they need.”
Ends
Notes to editors
About Centre for Cities: