Devolution deals to be finalised in advance of the Spending Review in the autumn
The Chancellor has come under increasing pressure in the last fortnight regarding his re-balancing and devolution agendas, with many identifying Network Rail’s announcement of “pauses” to the electrification of a number of northern rail lines as evidence that the Northern Powerhouse in particular was dead before it had even got started.
Given the extent to which his own political fortunes are now bound up with the delivery of these initiatives, it was no surprise that Osborne mounted somewhat of a fightback in this afternoon’s Budget statement. Framed as a “One Nation Budget”, the Chancellor announced further details on the creation of Transport for the North, and critically, the transfer of yet more powers to Greater Manchester, as well as referencing possible further deals for West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire and Merseyside, subject to those areas accepting an elected Mayor.
These announcements represent a welcome escalation and expansion of the devolution agenda to potentially include more places and more powers, but they should also bring renewed urgency for those city-regions not cited – including the North East, West Midlands and West of England – that there is no time to waste in getting a deal done.
That’s because the Budget reminds us that in the six months since the Greater Manchester Devolution Deal was announced, the clear blue water between it and other cities across the country in terms of the powers it will wield has grown considerably. Come 2017, Greater Manchester will now have new powers over transport, housing, land, planning, police, fire, and children’s services, while other city regions – even those in which real political and administrative progress has been made – have not yet decided either whether they are prepared to do a deal, or the basis on which they would do it.
Now it seems that Liverpool, Leeds and Sheffield, together with their neighbouring councils, have jumped ahead in the queue to follow Manchester’s lead. Given that practically there will be a limit on the number of substantial devolution deals the Government can oversee during the coming Parliament, these announcements have further upped the pressure on leaders in Newcastle, Birmingham and Bristol to secure a deal quickly.
It’s also becoming clear that the window within which to secure a substantial deal is closing. The Treasury’s red book sets out an expectation that devolution deals will be finalised in advance of the Spending Review in the Autumn, reflecting the need to ensure the devolution of budgets can be included in the Government’s long term spending plans. That indicates cities have, at best, five months to agree and deliver a significant devolution deal for their area, or risk missing out for the remainder of this Parliament.
Nobody should underestimate the political difficulties that the Chancellor’s devolution agenda – particularly his insistence on a city-region mayor – presents in some parts of the country, nor the progress being made across city-regions in that regard. But equally, nobody can afford to be complacent that they will receive a significant deal come what may. The Chancellor has been clear in what he expects from city-regions in order to receive new powers over things like transport, housing, police and health, and now we have more clarity on the kind of additional powers that could be available, and when deals will need to be done by.
The powers currently on offer may not reflect everything that city regions across the country would, in an ideal world, like control over – and there remains an absence of any fiscal powers even within the Greater Manchester Deal. But the fact is that the devolution train is preparing to leave the station, and some city-regions risk being stranded on the platform. It’s time for leaders in those places to act.
Director of Communications and Development
Leave a comment
This isn’t devolution; this is the Chancellor pushing the heads of the northern cities into having to take responsibility for the further cuts in public spending he is forcing on us, in exchange for very limited extra room to manoeuvre: no fiscal powers means they will always be at the back and call of Osborne.
There has been no consultation with the public over any of this; it has no democratic legitimacy.
And as he sees no chance of getting any Conservative leaders into power through the current local government elections, he is insisting on elected mayors as an attempt to do so – because the Conservative – supporting media will back such candidates. The recent referenda on elected mayors largely threw them out. So how dare he insist? Do we want Borises here in the north? No we don’t.
Centre for Cities is clearly not interested in the democracy for our cities that is essential for real devolution – that is, real power shifts so that local people can decide.
First rule in any deal-making; if the salesperson in any way pressurises you with something like ‘my friend this deal is strictly time limited, we have to close now’… walk away. This especially applies when the deal is A Big Deal. Time for clear-headed ‘leadership’, or rather stewardship – on the part of the regional players within the much-painted ‘Northern Power House’.